Dunlap Competition 12-10-22

The placements are according to IDTA’s ranking rules: the combined scores of both judges, minus penalties.

The score shown is 8CA’s simulated IHSA-style score: the average of the two judges, minus penalties

These dances were performed separately from these teams’ IDTA category performances and judged solely by the IHSA rubric by IHSA judges.

For IDTA category competition results and where these dances placed when performed in the IDTA category rubric, see the IDTA website here.

1A SCORES / DUNLAP COMPETITION 12-10-22
Placement (by combined score)Team+routineAverage Score after penaltiesScore (judge 1)Score (judge 2)Notes
1stClinton 186.4585.787.2
2ndClinton 285.7585.985.8
3rdMorton83.6583.384.0
4thUnity (Tolono)79.1079.179.6penalties: -0.25
5thEureka 276.5076.376.7
6thElmwood75.0073.776.3
7thWarrensburg-Latham 273.1074.272.5penalties: -0.25
8thBishop McNamara72.6573.572.8penalties: -0.50
9thWarrensburg-Latham 172.1572.072.3
10thEureka 171.6571.172.2
11thVilla Grove69.8071.372.3penalties: -2.00
12thLincoln71.1070.170.6penalties: -0.25
13thKnoxville68.3068.768.4penalties: -0.25
14thNotre Dame (Peoria) 165.6065.465.8
15thKewanee63.8563.264.5
16thNotre Dame (Peoria) 263.4063.263.6
2A SCORES / DUNLAP COMPETITION 12-10-22
Placement (by combined score)Team+routineAverage Score after penaltiesScore (judge 1)Score (judge 2)Notes
1stDunlap 290.6590.590.8
2ndWashington 286.7086.986.5
3rdWashington 185.4585.685.3
4thDunlap 183.7583.484.1
5thPekin73.7573.874.2penalties: -0.25
6thBloomington73.1073.573.2penalties: -0.25
7thDanville65.6066.666.4penalties: -1.00