Clinton Competition 01-14-23

The placements are according to IDTA’s ranking rules: the combined scores of both judges, minus penalties.

The score shown is 8CA’s simulated IHSA-style score: the average of the two judges, minus penalties

These dances were performed separately from these teams’ IDTA category performances and judged solely by the IHSA rubric by IHSA judges.

For IDTA category competition results and where these dances placed when performed in the IDTA category rubric, see the IDTA website here.

1A SCORES / CLINTON COMPETITION 1-14-23
Placement (by combined score)Team+routineAverage Score after penaltiesScore (judge 1)Score (judge 2)Notes
1stClinton 192.7092.792.7
2ndElmwood87.8088.187.5
3rdClinton 285.6085.485.8
4thNotre Dame (Quincy)85.5085.985.1
5thMaroa-Forsyth 283.8085.184.5penalties: -1.00
6thMorton83.4083.982.9
7thEureka 183.2083.283.2
8thEureka 282.2582.482.1
9thWarrensburg-Latham 281.5081.881.2
10thUnity (Tolono)81.3581.281.5
11thMaroa-Forsyth 180.1580.180.2
12thVilla Grove79.5580.680.5
13thWarrensburg-Latham 178.9579.378.6
14thLincoln77.9078.378.0
15thNotre Dame (Peoria) 277.6077.677.6
16thKnoxville 177.4077.577.3
17thNotre Dame (Peoria) 173.3578.278.5
18thJersey74.7075.973.8penalties: -0.25
19thKnoxville 271.6071.571.7
20thMahomet-Seymour71.3071.271.4
21stBishop McNamara69.3569.669.1
2A SCORES / CLINTON COMPETITION 1-14-23
Placement (by combined score)Team+routineAverage Score after penaltiesScore (judge 1)Score (judge 2)Notes
1stWashington 193.7093.993.5
2ndDunlap 288.6588.688.5
3rdWashington 288.3088.588.1
4thDunlap 183.6083.683.6
5thNormal West83.3083.982.7
6thBloomington77.8578.278.0penalties: -0.25
7thChampaign Central77.2077.077.4